TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 1135X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... information on all products of the Petitioner - vires of Section 171 of the CGST Act - HELD THAT:- The Court is of the view that the Petitioner has made out a prima facie case for granted of limited interim relief. It is directed that, till the next date, it will not be required to furnish information to the DGAP pursuant to the impugned notice other than information pertaining to the Complained P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2. Notice. Mr. Asheesh Jain, Central Govt. Standing Counsel accepts notice for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for Respondents 2 and 3. 3. Replies be filed within three weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed by the next date. 4. It is pointed out by Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned Senior Counsel for Petitioner, that the National Anti-Prof ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... accordance with the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). It is the case of the Petitioner that without there being a report of the DGAP on the complained product followed by an order of NAPA in terms of Rule 133 (5) (a) of the CGST Rules, the DGAP cannot suo motu issue a notice requiring the Petitioner to submit information on all its products which are approximat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|