2019 (8) TMI 163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat even clause (a) of explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c) does not refer to returned income so as to limit the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) with reference to difference between tax on Assessed Income and Returned Income? - HELD THAT:- We dismiss this Tax Appeal in view of the order dictated today by us in SHREE SAI DEVELOPERS [ 2019 (8) TMI 59 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] wherein held no error not to speak of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. 2. The Revenue has proposed the following three substantial questions of law for the consideration of this Court: [ A] Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the penalty of ₹ 2,28,95,820/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. [ B] Whether on t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X