9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 278X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has been describes by the chemical examiner as Coordination Compound . The literature of foreign supplier as well as the test reports produced by the appellant also describe prodyuct as chelated Iron or Chelated Zinc . It is seen that the decision in case of Ciba India Ltd [ 2008 (12) TMI 475 - CESTAT, CHENNAI ] was taken in respect of Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) which is on chelating agent and also contains Nitrogen, Zinc, Manganese and Iron. In the said case, the reliance has been placed on Note 6 of Chapter 31 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - It fails to notice that the Chapter 31 does not include separate chemically defined compounds. In respect of separately defined chemical, the chapter Notes permits classification under Chapter 31 only with reference to chapter 2(a), 3(a), 4(a) or 5 to Chapter 31. It is apparent that separately define chemical which may also answered to Note 6 to Chapter 31 would not be covered under Chapter 31. Moreover, it is seen that Chapter 29 covers all separate chemical define organics compound. The Note 2 of Chapter 29 excludes only Urea falling under heading 3102 or 3105 from the purview of Chapter 29. On combine reading ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mine Tetra Acetic Acid Di-Sodium-Iron Complex. It is a co-ordination compound. It is having following characteristics: Iron (chelated by EDTA) =11.9% PH (1%) =4.00 Noter-Co-ordination Compound are finds mentioned in Chapter29 Noters 5 (c) (3) . (B) Megaboost ZN The sample is in the form of light brown powder. It is ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid Di-Sodium- Zinc Complex. It is a co-ordination compound. It is having following characteristics: % Zinc (chelated by EDTA) =13.6% PH (1%) =4.00 Noter-Co-ordination Compound are finds mentioned in Chapter29 Noters 5 (c) (3) . The test report was challenged by the appellant and retest report was received from the Director (Revenue Laboratories), Central Revenue Control Laboratory, New Delhi vide their letter F. No. 75-Exo/C- 18/2009-10 dated 26.03.2010. The test result is as under: MEGABOOST Fe Lab No. CLR/28, dated.24.02.2010 The sample is in the form of light brown powder. It is ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid Disodium (EDTA) Iron (Fe) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es under reference was received in a unit packing in a printed Carton. As such each is a Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid Disodium (EDTA)-Iron (Fe) and Zinc (Zn) Complex- a co-ordination compound. It is true that each of the two samples contains Nitrogen, but this nitrogen is from EDTA only. Each is free from Mineral or chemical fertilizers-Nitrogenous covered under Chapter31 which is evident from the Iron and Zinc contents in the samples as mentioned under Chapter31. EDTA chelates are not covered under nitrogenous fertilizers. Therefore each merits classification under Chapter29 of Central Excise Tariff. Further, as per Central Excise Circular No. 392/1998, it is also stated that Notification under FCO covering micronutrients is irrelevant for deciding classification under the Central Excise Tariff and regardless of such notification, the appropriate consideration should be whether or not the micronutrient in question is a separate chemically defined compound, if it is, the classification under Chapter31.05 is rules out On the basis of report it was alleged by the Revenue that the product i.e. Megaboost is Coordination Comp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ial micronutrients for the plant growth, once the micronutrients are delivered at the plant system EDTA breaks out resulting in elemental nitrogen which further helps to promote the plant growth and that without nitrogen it is not possible to deliver the metal ions or micronutrients to the plant system. This certificate was placed by the appellants before the authorities below. Further reliance placed by the Revenue on the specific exclusion of separate chemically defined compounds from Heading 3105.90 in the HSN Explanatory Notes (the EDTA chelate is separate chemically defined compound) is also misplaced for the reason that HSN Explanatory Notes to Chapter 29 clearly state that separate chemically defined compounds containing other substances deliberately added during or after their manufacture are excluded from Chapter 29 and the product in dispute contains zinc/manganese/iron which is deliberately added. In the light of the above discussion, we hold that the imported item falls for classification under CTH 3105.90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as micronutrient and not under CTH 29.22, that the benefit of the exemption from payment of CVD and SAD under Notification 4/2006 (S. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s fertilizer or under chapter 29 specifically defined chemical. It is seen that the decision in case of Ciba India Ltd (Supra) was taken without considering Chapter Note 5 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which reads as under: \ (C) Subject to Note 1 to Section VI and Note 2 to Chapter28: (1) Inorganic salts of organic compounds such as acid-, phenol- or enolfunction compounds or organic bases, of sub- Chapters I to X or heading 2942, are to be classified in the heading appropriate to the organic compound; and (2) Salts formed between organic compounds of sub- Chapters I to X or heading 2942 are to be classified in the heading appropriate to the base or to the acid (including phenol- or enol-function compounds) from which they are formed, whichever occurs last in numerical order in the Chapter. (3) Co-ordination compounds, other than products classifiable in sub Chapter XI or heading 2941, are to be classified in the heading which occurs last in numerical order in Chapter29, among those appropriate to the fragments formed by cleaving of all metal bonds, other than metalcarbon bonds. The ear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uct as Coordination Compound and not as a mixture. The literature of foreign supplier as well as the test reports produced by the appellant also describe prodyuct as chelated Iron or Chelated Zinc . It is seen that the decision in case of Ciba India Ltd (supra) was taken in respect of Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) which is on chelating agent and also contains Nitrogen, Zinc, Manganese and Iron. In the said case, the reliance has been placed on Note 6 of Chapter 31 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which reads as under: 6. For the purposes of heading 3105, the term other fertilizers applies only to products of a kind used as fertilizers and containing, as an essential constituent, at least one of the fertilizing elements nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium. It fails to notice that the Chapter 31 does not include separate chemically defined compounds. Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 31 reads as under: 1. This Chapter does not cover: (a) Animal blood of heading 0511; (b) Separate chemically defined compounds (other than those answering to the descriptions in Noter 2(a), 3(a), 4(a) or 5, below); or (c) Cultured potassium c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
