2019 (10) TMI 1113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the two successive judgments of this Tribunal in the appellant s own case GANESH INTERNATIONAL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NAGPUR [ 2004 (4) TMI 142 - CESTAT, MUMBAI] and GANESH INTERNATIONAL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI [ 2012 (9) TMI 537 - CESTAT, MUMBAI] where this Tribunal after exhaustive analysis of the relevant material and evidence on record, classified the product under C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... adjournment would not yield any result. Accordingly, the appeal is taken up for disposal. 2. This is an appeal filed against order-in-appeal No. 606(GR.I)/2012 (JNCH)/IMP-540 dated 09.10.2012 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-II. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant had filed 12 Bills of Entry for clearance of long pepp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i). He submits that in the aforesaid cases, this Tribunal after exhaustive analysis of the relevant material and evidence on record, classified the product under CTH 09041110. Therefore, there is no merit in the appeal. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the learned AR for the Revenue and perused the records. We find that the short issue involved in the pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X