9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 12X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds in question have already been permitted. Moreover, as submitted by the counsel for respondent that vide communication dated 15th October, 2019 which is Annexure-A to the counter filed by respondent No.4, this petitioner has already been communicated that NOC is granted for re-export of the goods in question. Thus, the main grievance ventilated in this writ petition about the re-export of the go ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ugh: Ms. Amrita Joshi Ms. Prerana Agarwal, Advs. Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Gitesh Chopra, Adv. for UOI Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Gagan Vaswani, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 Mr. Amit Bansal, Mr. Aman Rewaria Ms.Vipasha Mishra, Advs. for R-5 JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. This so called Public Interest Litigation has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... legal detention of goods by the Respondents, and/or (d) Issue suitable directions, orders as are deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Having heard the counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the Order-In-Original has already been passed by the concerned authority. Re-export of the goods in question have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... law. Accordingly, this petitioner is bound to make the payment of demurrages. Hence, we see no reason to entertain this writ petition for waiver of the demurrages. The law is explicitly clear about the demurrages as stated in our judgment in M/s Global Impex Through Its Partner v. Manager, Celebi Import Shed and Anr. in W.P.(C) 7577/2019 dated 20th December, 2019. 4. With the aforesaid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
