9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (4) TMI 468X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS J. PETITIONER: BY ADV. SRI.V.DEVANANDA NARASIMHAM RESPONDENTS: DR.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT.PLEADER JUDGMENT The prayers in this Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows: (i) to issue a direction to the 1st respondent to appear before this Hon'ble Court along with relevant records to explain reasons for non-complying the directions contained in Exbt-P3, Exbt- P4 appellate orders passed by the 2nd respondent and to explain such reasons of violating natural justice to the petitioner by denying an opportunity of being heard while passing Exbt-P5 modified assessment order for the year 2015-16 in a cryptic manner; (ii) to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondents. 3. When the matter was taken up for consideration on the previous occasion, this Court had directed the 1st respondent to furnish the details to the learned Government Pleader, as to the matters in relation to the impugned Ext.P-5 assessment order and Ext.P-7 rectification application , etc. Today when the matters has been taken up for consideration, Dr.Thushara James, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit on the basis of instructions that it appears that the 1st respondent has now already passed orders on Ext.P-7 application, rejecting the plea of the petitioner and orders in that regard will be immediately communicated to the petitioner, without any further delay. 4. Sri.V.Devananda ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty to work out his remedies, in relation to the orders said to have been passed by the 1st respondent in Ext.P-7, in the manner known to law, if the petitioner has any legally justiciable grievances thereto. (iv) Further it is ordered that the 1st respondent should also give factual instructions to the learned Government Pleader, while he communicates a copy of the order said to have been passed by him on Ext.P-7, as to whether the 1st respondent had granted reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner before he had rendered the impugned Ext.P-5 assessment order and also whether he had rendered personal opportunity of being heard to the petitioner before he had rendered the present order said to have been passed by him, purs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
