Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (6) TMI 170

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to be income of the firm for the purposes of income tax. It is open for the AO to take appropriate action under section 69 of the act against the person who has not been able to explain the investment. In the case at hand, the assessee has discharged its onus satisfactorily by furnishing all the relevant evidences. Therefore, when the firm is disclosing capital introduction by the partner providing names and PAN nos of contributing partners, then no addition can be made in the hands of the firm - Decided in favour of assessee. Disallowance under various heads of expenses - adhoc disallowance by disallowing 20% of the expenses - HELD THAT:- The onus is on the assessee to prove the genuineness of expenses claimed by furnishing relevant bills and vouchers. When the assessee is unable to produce the bills and vouchers, the Assessing Officer can make reasonable addition, as he deems proper. In this case, the assessee has produced ledger copies in support of various expenses incurred by him. The assessee is in the business of hotel and textile business and is bound to incur the above expenditure for smooth running of the hotel and textile business but has to keep the bills and vouchers f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s confirmed in first appeal by the ld CIT(A). 5. Ld A.R. submitted that all the partners who have introduced the amount in assessee firm are assessed to income tax in their individual capacity. He submitted that the names and address, PAN of the partners have been filed before the departmental authorities. He submitted that the partners have disclosed the aforesaid investment in the assessee s firm in their respective income tax returns. The capital introduction is owned by the partners, therefore, the addition cannot be added in the hands of the assessee firm. In support of this, reliance has also been placed on the following decisions: i) CIT vs. Metachem Industries, 245 ITR 160 II) CIT vs. Burma Electro Corporation, 252 IT 344 (PH) 6. Replying to above, ld DR supported the orders of lower authorities. 7. We have considered the rival submissions. On careful examination of facts, we are of the considered opinion that the basic requirements of section 68 have been discharged by the assessee by furnishing the relevant evidences. The evidences which were furnished by the assessee were confirmation letters of the partners, copies of I.T.Returns, PAN Nos, and income declared. By furnis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... owance by disallowing 20% of the expenses, which is not correct and the adhoc addition be deleted,. 11. Replying to above, ld DR submitted that when the assessee was unable to furnish the relevant bills and vouchers and other related documents in support of the claim, the AO was correct in making adhoc disallowance. He submitted that for making the disallowance, the AO has referred several judicial pronouncements as stated in the assessment order. Hence, he urged to confirm the orders of lower authorities. 12. On consideration of the rival submissions, we observe that the assessee has incurred ₹ 92,33,232/- under various heads of expenses and claimed the same as deduction. The Assessing Officer required the assessee to produce the bills and vouchers but the assessee only produced ledger copies of expenses showing the details of expenditure but failed to produce the relevant bills and vouchers. The onus is on the assessee to prove the genuineness of expenses claimed by furnishing relevant bills and vouchers. When the assessee is unable to produce the bills and vouchers, the Assessing Officer can make reasonable addition, as he deems proper. In this case, the assessee has produ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot practicable so to do on the ground of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances of the case, the Bench shall fix a future day for pronouncement of the order, and such date shall not ordinarily be a day beyond a further period of 30 days and due notice of the day so fixed shall be given on the notice board. As such, ordinarily , the order on an appeal should be pronounced by the Bench within no more than 90 days from the date of concluding the hearing. It is, however, important to note that the expression ordinarily has been used in the said rule itself. This rule was inserted as a result of directions of Hon ble High Court in the case of Shivsagar Veg Restaurant vs ACIT (2009) 319 ITR 433 (Bom), wherein, it was, inter alia, observed as under: We, therefore, direct the President of the Appellate Tribunal to frame and lay down the guidelines in the similar lines as are laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Anil Rai (supra) and to issue appropriate administrative directions to all the benches of the Tribunal in that behalf. We hope and trust that suitable guidelines shall be framed and issued by the President of the Appellate Tribunal within shortest reasonable time and foll .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bombay High Court, in an order dated 15th April 2020, has, besides extending the validity of all interim orders, has also observed that, It is also clarified that while calculating time for disposal of matters made time-bound by this Court, the period for which the order dated 26th March 2020 continues to operate shall be added and time shall stand extended accordingly , and also observed that arrangement continued by an order dated 26th March 2020 till 30th April 2020 shall continue further till 15th June 2020 . It has been an unprecedented situation not only in India but all over the world. Government of India has, vide notification dated 19th February 2020, taken the stand that, the coronavirus should be considered a case of natural calamity and FMC (i.e. force majeure clause) maybe invoked, wherever considered appropriate, following the due procedure... . The term force majeure has been defined in Black s Law Dictionary, as an event or effect that can be neither anticipated nor controlled When such is the position, and it is officially so notified by the Government of India and the Covid-19 epidemic has been notified as a disaster under the National Disaster Management Act, 200 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates