9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (9) TMI 42X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7(2) makes it clear that money can also be seized by authorized officer - The word things appears in Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 is to be given wide meaning and as per Black's Law Dictionary, 10th Edition, any subject matter of ownership within the spear of proprietary or valuable right, would come under the definition of thing (page No.1707). Thus, keeping in view the aforesaid interpretation of the word thing money has to be included and it cannot be excluded as prayed by the petitioner from Section 67(2). The present case is at the stage of search and seizure. A search has been carried out and proceedings are going on. Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances of the case, the material available in the case diary and also keeping in view Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, this Court is of the opinion that the authorities have rightly seized the amount from the husband of the petitioner and unless and until the investigation is carried out and the matter is finally adjudicated, the question of releasing the amount does not arise - Petition dismissed. - Writ Petition No. 8204/2020 - - - Dated:- 26-8-2020 - S. C. SHARMA And SHAILENDRA SHUKLA , ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the ground that without their being any provision under the CGST Act, 2017 the amount as seized by the respondents could not have been done and the same is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The another ground raised by the petitioner that the raid on the residential premises of petitioner and her husband is again violative of Article 19 and finally a prayer has been made to release the seized cash / sale proceeds to the tune of ₹ 66,43,130/-. 06-A reply has been filed in the matter by respondents No.1 to 5 and it has been stated that from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a specific input was received that Shri Sanjay Matta is involved in large scale of evasion of GST on Pan Masala. The proper officer under reasonable beliefs that the goods / documents / things were secreted at the said premises, issued a search warrant dated 30/05/2020 and a consequential search was carried out at the residential premises of Shri Sanjay Matta on 30/05/2020 by the Team of Directorate General of GST Intelligence. A Panchnama dated 30/05/2020 was also prepared and the officers seized documents and cash amounting to ₹ 66,43,130/-. 07-It has been stated that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /2020 at the residential premises of Shri Sanjay Matta and Shri Sandeep Matta and various godowns operated by them on the reasonable belief that the aforesaid premises are being used to clandestinely store goods / records / documents / things. During the searches it was found that huge quantity of Pan Masala and tobacco were lying / stored in the various godowns of Shri Sanjay Matta which are neither declared as principal place of business nor as additional place of business as mandatorily required under Section 22 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 8 of CGST Rules, 2017. 13-Goods comprising of Pan Masala, Tobacco, Mouth Freshener, Confectionery, etc. valued at ₹ 2.59 Crores were seized under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act read with Section 129 of the CGST Act and Section 130 of CGST Act from six godowns operated by Shri Sanjay Matta and his brother Shri Sandeep Matta as no bills / invoices could be produced by them. Unaccounted cash of ₹ 66,43,130/- was also seized from the residential premises of Shri Sanjay Matta. 14-The case diary also reveals that seizure was done under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 under a reasonable belief that the aforesaid are the proc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lic authorities; 2(31). consideration in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes (a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government; (b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government: Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply; 2(75). money means the Indian legal tender or any foreign currency, cheque, promissory note, bill of exchange, letter of credit, draft, pay order, traveller cheque, money order, postal or electronic remittance or any other instrument recognised by the Reserve Ba ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or or omission in respect of the details furnished under sub-section (1) shall be allowed after furnishing of the return under section 39 for the month of September following the end of the financial year to which such details pertain, or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier. Explanation : For the purposes of this Chapter, the expression details of outward supplies shall include details of invoices, debit notes, credit notes and revised invoices issued in relation to outward supplies made during any tax period. 41.Claim of input tax credit and provisional acceptance thereof (1) Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, be entitled to take the credit of eligible input tax, as self-assessed, in his return and such amount shall be credited on a provisional basis to his electronic credit ledger. (2) The credit referred to in sub-section (1) shall be utilised only for payment of self-assessed output tax as per the return referred to in the said sub-section. 52.Collection of tax at source (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, every electronic comm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orrect particulars in the statement to be furnished for the month during which such omission or incorrect particulars are noticed, subject to payment of interest, as specified in sub- section (1) of section 50: PROVIDED that no such rectification of any omission or incorrect particulars shall be allowed after the due date for furnishing of statement for the month of September following the end of the financial year or the actual date of furnishing of the relevant annual statement, whichever is earlier. (7) The supplier who has supplied the goods or services or both through the operator shall claim credit, in his electronic cash ledger, of the amount collected and reflected in the statement of the operator furnished under sub-section (4), in such manner as may be prescribed. (8) The details of supplies furnished by every operator under sub-section (4) shall be matched with the corresponding details of outward supplies furnished by the concerned supplier registered under this Act in such manner and within such time as may be prescribed. (9) Where the details of outward supplies furnished by the operator under sub-section (4) do not match with the corresponding det ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pursuant to an inspection carried out under sub-section (1) or otherwise, has reasons to believe that any goods liable to confiscation or any documents or books or things, which in his opinion shall be useful for or relevant to any proceedings under this Act, are secreted in any place, he may authorise in writing any other officer of central tax to search and seize or may himself search and seize such goods, documents or books or things: PROVIDED that where it is not practicable to seize any such goods, the proper officer, or any officer authorised by him, may serve on the owner or the custodian of the goods an order that he shall not remove, part with, or otherwise deal with the goods except with the previous permission of such officer: PROVIDED further that the documents or books or things so seized shall be retained by such officer only for so long as may be necessary for their examination and for any inquiry or proceedings under this Act. 75.General provisions relating to determination of tax (1) Where the service of notice or issuance of order is stayed by an order of a court or Appellate Tribunal, the period of such stay shall be excluded in computing the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings and an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal or the High Court or the Supreme Court against such decision of the Appellate Authority or the Appellate Tribunal or the High Court is pending, the period spent between the date of the decision of the Appellate Authority and that of the Appellate Tribunal or the date of decision of the Appellate Tribunal and that of the High Court or the date of the decision of the High Court and that of the Supreme Court shall be excluded in computing the period referred to in sub-section (10) of section 73 or sub-section (10) of section 74 where proceedings are initiated by way of issue of a show cause notice under the said sections. (12) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 73 or section 74, where any amount of self-assessed tax in accordance with a return furnished under section 39 remains unpaid, either wholly or partly, or any amount of interest payable on such tax remains unpaid, the same shall be recovered under the provisions of section 79. (13) Where any penalty is imposed under section 73 or section 74, no penalty fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he case of D. Vinod Shivappa Vs. Nanda Belliappa reported in (2006) 6 SCC 456 in paragraph No.12 as held as under:- 12.It is well settled that in interpreting a statute the court must adopt that construction which suppresses the mischief and advances the remedy. This is a rule laid down in Heydon's case [(1584) 76 ER 637 : 3 Co Rep 7a] also known as the rule of purposive construction or mischief rule. Therefore, keeping in view the aforesaid interpretation of the word thing money has to be included and it cannot be excluded as prayed by the petitioner from Section 67(2). The present case is at the stage of search and seizure. A search has been carried out and proceedings are going on. 21-A Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sumedha Dutta Another Vs. The Union of India Another (Writ Petition No.23680/2018, decided on 04/04/2019) in paragraphs No.9 to 12 has held as under:- 9. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) Others v/s Spacewood Furnishers Pvt. Ltd Others reported in 2015 (374) ITR 595 (SC) has dealt with the scope of interference by the High Court in the matter of search and seizure. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... statements made before Customs Officer though retracted within six days is an admission and binding since Custom Officers are not Police Officers. In the present case also the statements were made confessing the guilt by the husband of the petitioner and later on he has retracted from that statement as stated in the writ petition and therefore, in light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment no relief can be granted in the present writ petition on the basis of aforesaid ground keeping in view the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court. 23-A Division Bench of this Court in the case of R. S. Company Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2017 (351) E.L.T. 264 (M.P.) has dealt with confessional statements and decided the matter in favour of the revenue and therefore, the ground raised in the present petition that the husband of the petitioner retracted the confessional statement does not help the petitioner nor her husband in any manner. 24-Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a judgment delivered in the case of Vinod Solanki Vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2008) 16 SCC 537. Heavy reliance has been placed in paragraph No.23 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
