Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (3) TMI 1104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ifically state the grounds mentioned in section 271(1)(c) of the Act, i.e., whether it is for concealment of income or for furnishing of incorrect particulars of income. Sending printed form where all the grounds mentioned in section 271 are mentioned would not satisfy requirement of law. Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. [ 2019 (8) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT] reiterated that notice under section 274 should specifically state the grounds on which penalty was sought to be imposed as the assessee should know the grounds which he has to meet specifically. The aforesaid principle has been reiterated in the in the case of CIT vs. SSA'S Emerald Meadows [ 2015 (11) TMI 1620 - KARNATAKA HI .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... )(c) of the Act is bad in law as the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271 of the Act is not discernable as to whether the penalty proceedings is initiated for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of income and therefore, the impugned penalty order passed deserves to be cancelled. 4. Admission of the additional ground has been opposed in principle by the ld. DR. Keeping in view, the judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. Vs CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383, the additional ground filed by the assessee is accepted. The relevant portion of the judgment is as under: 5. Under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, the Appellate Tribunal may, after giving both the pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , prescribed by the statutory provisions. In the absence of any statutory provision, the appellate authority is vested with all the plenary powers which the subordinate authority may have in the matter. There is no good reason to justify curtailment of the power of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in entertaining an additional ground raised by the assessee in seeking modification of the order of assessment passed by the Income-tax Officer. This Court further observed that there may be several factors justifying the raising of a new plea in an appeal and each case has to be considered on its own facts. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner must be satisfied that the ground raised was bona fide and that the same could not have been raised .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... grounds taken up by the assessee are hereby admitted. 6. Adjudication after admitting the additional grounds. 7. At the outset, the Ld. AR argued that the notice issued was bad in law and void ab initio as the notice prima facie did not satisfy the condition as to which limb of section 271(1)(c) the penalty has been levied either concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. It was argued that that it is elementary that for assuming valid jurisdiction to impose penalty, the assessing officer must, first be satisfied, though prima facie, that the assessee has either concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income and on the basis of such satisfaction a show cause notice has to be issued under sectio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case of PCIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. in ITA No. 475 of 2019, reiterated that notice under section 274 should specifically state the grounds on which penalty was sought to be imposed as the assessee should know the grounds which he has to meet specifically. 12. The aforesaid principle has been reiterated in the in the case of CIT vs. SSA'S Emerald Meadows: 73 taxmann.com 241 (Kar) [Revenue s SLP dismissed in 242 Taxman 180] 13. In the present case, too, in notice dated 05.12.2011 and on 08.12.2014 issued under section 274 read with section 271 of the Act, initiated penalty against the appellant for alleged concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income , that is to say, the specific .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates