9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (10) TMI 320X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... suing the Demand Notice is stated to be a misunderstanding by the official respondents that the petitioner-unit was entitled to avail the benefits for a period of 10 years commencing from 2009 which period would end in 2019. Notice - List again on 18.11.2021. - WP(C) No. 2111/2021, CM No. 7677/2021 - - - Dated:- 1-10-2021 - Hon ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Judge And Hon ble Mr. Just ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ne of production and substantial expansion made therein, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner-unit became entitled to exemption of payment from Central Excise Department started from 07.06. 2012 in line with the notification No. 1/2010 dated 06.02.2010. The benefit which the petitioner was availing in terms of notification of 2010 would have been valid till 06.06.2022. 3. I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner stated that the petitioner is otherwise entitled to receive the benefits with effect from the date of substantial expansion for the period of 10 years and not from the date of initial production in the year 2009. 6. Prima-facie, a case is made out. 7. Notice. 8. Mr. Jagpaul Singh, learned Sr. CGSC waives notice on behalf of the respondents. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
