2021 (10) TMI 945

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ct of classification of product specified as whey protein , is the correct view, which does not require interference. The Tribunal has rightly endorsed that position. It is a different matter that the Tribunal in the impugned judgment ought to have elaborated on the aspects dealt with by the Commissioner, to take that view. That does not take the matter any further for the Appellant-Department. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... AOR, Mahabir Singh, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Vikrant Yadav and Shyam Gopal, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V. Sridharan, Sr. Advocate, Rahul Gupta, AOR, Jaydeep Patel, Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Aditya Bhattacharya, Akshay Sharma and Ms. Mounica Kasturi, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER We have heard Learned Counsel for the parties at length. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Appellant-Department. 4. We uphold the finding of fact and thus, the conclusion reached by the Commissioner as well as the Appellate Tribunal in that regard. 5. However, the only indulgence that needs to be shown in this appeal is in regard to the issue of valuation. For, the Tribunal has not adverted to the efficacy of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and Section 4A of the Ce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X