9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (11) TMI 870X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d from representing in that matter, by this Tribunal. The order in TIA/9/KOB/2019 was passed on merits giving both sides ample opportunities to present their cases. Both the parties were heard extensively and only after that the order in TIA was passed. The applicant should have obeyed the order dated 29.09.2021 of the Hon ble High Court, if he is really aggrieved by the orders of this Tribunal dated 30.12.2019 TIA/9/KOB/2019. We do not find any substance in this application filed for restoration of TCP No. 13/KOB/2019. Restoration application dismissed. - Restoration Application (C/Act)01(KOB)2021 In TCP/13/KOB/2019 and IA (C/Act)/13(KOB)/2021 in Restoration Application(C/Act)/01 (KOB)2021 - - - Dated:- 18-11-2021 - Shri. Rajesh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ge, SRM Road, Cochin, Kerala-682018 and that the company filed its statutory returns up to the Financial Year ending 31.3.1999 and thereafter defaulted in filing the statutory returns. This Tribunal directed the Registry to issue notice again to the petitioner through Speed Post/AD in the address provided by the ROC and the said notice was issued. 3. When the matter was taken for hearing on 28.09.2020 the Registry reported that the notice sent through speed post/AD to the petitioner has been duly served on the petitioner company on 09.09.2020, as per the Acknowledgement Card signed by the authorized person putting the seal of the company. However, there was no appearance for the petitioner on 28.09.2020. In view of the above facts, this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmitted before us in relation to TIA/9/KOB/2019. On a reading of the order dated 31.12.2019 in TIA/9/KOB/2019 in TCP/13/KOB/2019 it is understood that the applicant was barred from representing the company until the disposal of the Company Petition No. TCP/13/KOB/2019. Order dated 30.12.2019 in TIA/9/KOB/2019 reads as under: - a. Restraining the Respondents No. 1 and 2 from convening any further meeting at the Administrative Office of ST Reddiar Sons (Quilon) P. Ltd, STR VV Tower and shopping complex, Main Road, Kollam- 691 001, or at any other place on any other date until further Orders of this Tribunal and final disposal of TCP/13/KOB/2019. b. Shri. S. Vijayakumar, District Judge (Retd) has been severely reprimanded by this Tr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioners to approach the appellate authority, the interim order passed by order dated 05.02.2020 and 29.01.2020 by this Court which is extracted in paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of this judgment will continue for a period of 30 days from today. Paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the judgment is reproduced as under: - 3. When W.P. (C)No.3175/2020 came up for consideration on 05.02.2020, this Court passed the following interim order: Issue notice before admission to respondents 2 and 3. Post on 17/2/2020 along with W. P. (C) No.2523 of 2020. The direction with regard to remittance of fine shall stand suspended for two weeks, subject to the contention with regard to maintainability of the writ petition. 4. Similarly, when W.P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unal dated 30.12.2019 TIA/9/KOB/2019. We do not find any substance in this application filed for restoration of TCP No. 13/KOB/2019. 8. Hence, the Restoration Application No. 01/KOB/2021 is dismissed. 9. IA (C/Act)/ 13/ KOB/ 2021 has been filed by the petitioner in TCP No. 13/KOB/2019 to condone the delay of 272 days in filing the restoration application. Since in the order in Restoration Application (C/Act)/1 (KOB)/2021, this Tribunal found that the applicant is barred from filing any application before this Tribunal vide order dated 30.12.2019 in TIA/9/KOB/2019, the question of condoning the delay and accepting any application from him will not arise. Hence, IA (C/Act)/13(KOB)/2021 also stands dismissed. Dated 18th November, 2021 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
