9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (5) TMI 221X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under section 234E of the Act relating to the period of tax deduction prior to 01.06.2015 was not maintainable. We also find that the Co ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Permanent Magnets Ltd. v/s DCIT [ 2019 (8) TMI 1049 - ITAT MUMBAI] following the aforesaid decision of the Hon ble Karnataka High Court in Fatheraj Sanghvi (supra) directed deletion of fee under section 234E of the Act levied vide intimation under section 200A of the Act for the period prior to 01.06.2015. It is well established that rules of procedure are handmaid of justice. Further, when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred. Thus, in view of the above, as the learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... no one was present on behalf of the assessee to represent the case. There is no application seeking adjournment either. Considering the nature of dispute, we proceed to dispose of the appeals ex-parte qua the assessee after hearing the learner departmental representative and on the basis of material available on record. 4. In these appeals, assessee is aggrieved with (i) levy of fee under section 234E of the Act vide intimation issued under section 200A(1) of the Act for the period prior to 01.06.2015; and (ii) dismissal of its appeals by the learned CIT(A) on the ground of delay. 5. The assessee filed separate appeals before the learned CIT(A) for assessment years under consideration against the purported order/intimation dated 09.0 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f delay from the date on which the default summary was downloaded by the assessee and not from the date of intimation/order under section 200A whereby the fee under section 234E of the Act was levied. The learned CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee that the assessee has not received any intimation of such outstanding dues and only upon initiation of recovery proceedings, assessee came to know about the outstanding demand. The learned CIT(A) vide separate impugned orders held that the assessee did not adduce any reasonable cause which prevented it from filing a valid appeal within the 30 days time limit under section 249(2) of the Act against the intimation issued under section 200A(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the learned CIT(A) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tatement u/s 200A was made applicable w.e.f. 01.06.2015 (Finance Act, 2015). However, the learned CIT(A) did not deal with merits of the case and proceeded to dismissed the appeals on the ground of delay and also defects in filing the appeals by the assessee. The learned CIT(A) also rejected the submission of the assessee seeking condonation of delay that the assessee has not received any intimation of such outstanding dues and only upon initiation of recovery proceedings, assessee came to know about the outstanding demand. 9. Further, on merits, we find that the issue whether clause (c) of section 200A(1), as substituted by Finance Act, 2015, w.e.f. 01.06.2015, whereby the A.O. was enabled to compute the fee under section 234E of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Act, 2015, enable computation of fee payable under section 234E of the Act at the time of processing of statement of TDS, is prospective in nature from 01.06.2015 and thus intimation issued under section 200A of the Act dealing with the fee under section 234E for belated filing of TDS return for the period prior to 01.06.2015, are invalid. 12. Further, we also find that the Co ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Permanent Magnets Ltd. v/s DCIT, ITA no.6436 to 6442/Mum./2018, order dated 07.08.2019, following the aforesaid decision of the Hon ble Karnataka High Court in Fatheraj Sanghvi (supra) directed deletion of fee under section 234E of the Act levied vide intimation under section 200A of the Act for the period prior to 01.06.2015. 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
