9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (9) TMI 1290X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sheet dated 7.1.2008 and much after his retirement when he had ceased to be the employee of PSEB. 2. The Respondent filed the Writ Petition in the High Court seeking quashing of the said charge sheet on the ground that it was barred in view of Rule 2.2.(B) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules 2 reserves right with the Government to withhold or withdraw a pension or a part of it under certain circumstances viz. when in judicial proceedings or departmental proceedings, such an employee is found to have committed grave misconduct or negligence. It also provides for recovery of peculiar loss, if caused. However, second proviso to the aforesaid provision stipulates the time limit within which the departmental inquiry can be instituted, in respect of an ex-employee if it was not stated while such a Government officer was in service. The precise language of second proviso is as follows: Such departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the officer was in service whether before his retirement or during his re-employment: (i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Government; (ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... resaid costs shall, in the first instance, be deposited by the Appellant with the Legal Services Authority, Punjab, within one month from today. The recovery thereof shall be made from the concerned officer within a further period of two months. In case, the aforesaid recovery is made from an officer who feels that the actual responsibility for filing the instant appeal rested on the shoulders of some other officer, it would be open to such officer to approach this Court by moving a civil miscellaneous application (in the instant Letters Patent Appeal) so as to require this Court to determine the accountability of the officer concerned. Since the provisions of the aforesaid statutory rule are crystal clear, we are in agreement with the High Court that the appeal preferred by the Petitioners was totally frivolous. Therefore, the High Court has rightly awarded the cost while dismissing such a merit less appeal. The only question is of recovery of this cost from the officer who authorised the filing of the said appeal. 7. Here we may note that the Courts are burdened with unnecessary litigation primarily because of the reason that the Government or PSUs etc. decide to fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... v. Union of India and Ors. 1974 (3) SCC 554. But it must be remembered that the State is no ordinary party trying to win a case against one of its own citizens by hook or by crook; for the State's interest is to meet honest claims, vindicate a substantial defence and never to score a technical point or overreach a weaker party to avoid a just liability or secure an unfair advantage, simply because legal devices provide such an opportunity. The State is a virtuous litigant and looks with unconcern on immoral forensic successes so that if on the merits the case is weak, government shows a willingness to settle the dispute regardless of prestige and other lesser motivations which move private parties to fight in court. The lay out on litigation costs and executive time by the State and its agencies is so staggering these days because of the large amount of litigation in which it is involved that a positive and wholesome policy of cutting back on the volume of law suits by the twin methods of not being tempted into forensic show downs where a reasonable adjustment is feasible and ever offering to extinguish a pending proceeding on just terms, giving the legal mentors of gov ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... observations because much of the litigation in which governments are involved adds to the case load accumulation in courts for which there is public criticism. We hope that a more responsive spirit will be brought to bear upon governmental litigation so as to avoid waste of public money and promote expeditious work in courts of cases which deserve to be attended to. Nearly a decade has passed since the observations but not a leaf has turned, not a step has been taken, and the Law Commission is asked to deal with the problem. 2.6. A little care, a touch of humanism, a dossier of constitutional philosophy and awareness of futility of public litigation would considerably improve the situation which today is distressing. More often it is found that utterly unsustainable contentions are taken on behalf of Government and public sector undertakings. 10. Even when Courts have, time and again, lamented about the frivolous appeals filed by the Government authorities, it has no effect on the bureaucratic psyche. It is not that there is no realisation at the level of policy makers to curtail unwanted Government litigation and there are deliberations in this behalf from time t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... provision lays down that further proceedings will not be filed in service matters merely because the order of the Administrative Tribunal affects a number of employees. Also, appeals will not be filed to espouse the cause of one section of employees against another. 13. The aforesaid litigation policy was seen as a silver living to club unnecessary and uncalled for litigation by this Court in the matter of Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner v. Mohan Lal 2010 (1) SCC 512 in the following manner: The Central Government is now attempting to deal with this issue by formulating realistic and practical norms for defending cases filed against the Government and for filing appeals and revisions against adverse decisions, thereby eliminating unnecessary litigation. But it is not sufficient if the Central Government alone undertakes such an exercise. The State Governments and the statutory authorities, who have more litigations than the Central Government, should also make genuine efforts to eliminate unnecessary litigations. Vexatious and unnecessary litigations have been clogging the wheels of justice for too long, making it difficult for courts and tribunals to provide easy and s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
