9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (6) TMI 358X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judgment of Cheminvest Limited [ 2015 (9) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT] and judgment passed in Commissioner of Income-tax, Central 1, Chennai v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd [ 2017 (4) TMI 298 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] . One of us i.e., Rajiv Shakdher, J., was part of the bench in Commissioner of Income-tax, Central 1, Chennai v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd [ 2017 (4) TMI 298 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] . ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is a delay of 55 days in re-filing the appeal. 2. Mr Kushagra Pandit, Advocate who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, says that he does not oppose the prayer made in the application. 3. Accordingly, the prayer made therein is allowed. 4. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ITA 252/2023 5. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2014-2015. 6. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2.09.2015 passed in ITA 749/2014 titled Cheminvest Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI and the judgment passed in Commissioner of Income-tax, Central 1, Chennai v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd. [2017] 80 taxmann.com 221 (Madras). 8. To be noted, one of us i.e., Rajiv Shakdher, J., was part of the bench in Commissioner of Income-tax, Central 1, Chennai v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
