TMI Blog2009 (1) TMI 101X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o present case & said order is itself bad in law – submission of revenue not acceptable - without entering into merits of the controversy, the Appeal is dismissed - 190 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 21-1-2009 - D. A. MEHTA and ABHILASHA KUMARI JJ. Mr. Harin P. Raval for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. ORDER D. A. MEHTA J. - The Appellant-Revenue has proposed the following two ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... said earlier period, whether the earlier order of Tribunal had been challenged, and if yes, the decision given thereof. 3. Today, the learned Counsel for the Appellant has invited our attention to the earlier order of Tribunal, since reported in 2000 (211) ELT 297 (Tribunal, Ahmedabad) and submitted that though the said order has not been challenged by Appellant-Revenue, the said earlier orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|