9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (11) TMI 661X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tive to appear before the 1st respondent - HELD THAT:- From the perusal of the averments made in the impugned order, it is seen that after receipt of the notice in the appeal proceedings, the appellant and his authorized representative had appeared before the 1st respondent and had sought adjournment, the appellate authority has not given the next date of hearing, but further notice was issued to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P 50 / 2022-23 B-72. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the respondents. 3. Being aggrieved by the order / demand issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 73(9) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the petitioner herein had preferred an appeal before the 1st respondent. The said appeal is disposed of vide the order Annexure - A dated 18.05.2023 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ents made in paragraphs 19 and 20 of the impugned order, it is seen that after receipt of the notice in the appeal proceedings, the appellant and his authorized representative had appeared before the 1st respondent and had sought adjournment, the appellate authority has not given the next date of hearing, but further notice was issued to the appellant and the authorized representative. It is the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
