9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (4) TMI 106X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... personal appearance - HELD THAT:- Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner had appeared before the concerned authority, however, since a large number of matters were listed in one day before the proper officer and no record of appearance is maintained, the impugned order records that petitioner did not appear. He further submits that a reply was submitted, however, on account of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. P.K. Gambhir and Mr. Akul Mangal, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocate. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent No. 4 with Ms. Suhani Mathur and Mr. Jatin Gaut, Advocates. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 29.12.20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... owever, on account of an error in the office of the petitioner, annexures to the reply, though mentioned in the reply, could not be uploaded. He prays that an opportunity be given to the petitioner to upload the supporting documents, inter-alia, the invoices, payment proof etc. and also an opportunity of personal appearance be given to the petitioner. 6. In view of the above, the impugned order da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
