2000 (8) TMI 1147

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondents : Ajit Kr. Sinha, Suhail Nathani, Imtiaz Ahmed (for Respondent 3 BLA Industries Ltd.), Gopal Jain and Nandini Gore, Advocates) ORDER 1. Amendment allowed. 2. The office report draws our attention to order dated 11-5-2000 in SLPs (C) Nos. 8203-212 of 2000 (Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India (2000) 118 ELT 305) filed against the judgment and order dated 21-1-2000 of Cegat. In the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... peal had been filed before the issuance of the notification of determination. 4. It is clear from the facts brought to our notice that determination as contemplated by Rule 18 had taken place with the issuance of the Notification dated 27-10-1998 and, therefore, an appeal under Section 9-C would be maintainable to Cegat. 5. Issue notice returnable after four weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X