Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty,...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked. However, the appellant had maintained records, provided intimation in Form D-3, and claimed exemption based on fly-ash usage above 25%. Audits conducted did not find discrepancies. The appellant did not suppress facts regarding fly-ash usage. The show cause notice alleged manipulation of fly-ash receipt records, but no reasons were provided to establish suppression of facts with intent to evade duty. The Supreme Court has held that for invoking extended limitation, duty non-payment should be due to fraud, collusion, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Mere failu..... .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X