1996 (4) TMI 126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... used the record. Both the learned Counsels agree that this writ petition may be finally disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the stay/waiver application filed alongwith the appeal has not been properly considered by the learned Tribunal and therefore he submitted another application dated 26-2-1996 pointing out the omissions and the record which w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has devoted all its attention to the ground of violation of Principles of Natural Justice and to the non-availability to show cause notice to which the appellant was required to make defence. Learned Counsel for the appellant had also urged the question of limitation in respect of the demands which were also not at all considered by the learned Tribunal. In these circumstances the learned Tribunal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ints from consideration while directing the appellant-petitioner to make pre-deposit of Rs. 5 lacs and without staying the confiscation order and the imposition of fine of Rs. 1 crore. Therefore the interest of justice requires that the learned Tribunal should reconsider these aspects on the basis of the application dated 26-2-1996. 5. The learned Standing Counsel has not been able to show any p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X