2005 (5) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y in filing the ROM application, has not been pressed by ld. Counsel and as such the same is dismissed. 2. The ROM application had been admittedly filed after the expiry period of six months and as such is time-barred. 3. The contention of the Counsel that the ROM application is to be governed by the earlier law under which the period of limitation was four years, cannot be accepted as no such .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... recall the order and to rehear the matter, as it cannot be said to be a mistake of fact apparent on the record. The plea of the appellants that the capacity of their furnace was 2.6 m.t. had been considered and discussed in paras 9 and 10 of the Final Order. The reappreciation of the evidence is not permissible and order for that purpose can be recalled on the ROM application moved by the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X