9911796707
TMI Blog1985 (9) TMI 100X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of daughters of the deceased. This claim was sought to be justified on the basis of the decision of this Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B" in E.D.A No. 3/Hyd/1970-71. The Appellate Controller has distinguished that decision on the ground that in the case the deceased had not earmarked any amount for the purpose of marriage of daughters and so. S. 33(1)(k) was not applicable. The Appellant Controller ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ass on death. The aforesaid decision of the Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, was also relied upon. 3. The ld. departmental representative argued that there was no such provision under s. 33(1)(K) or s. 44 of the ED Act. He also argued that this liability for maintenance was the same as under the IPC and there was no overriding charge or claim in respect of this right of maintenance. The deceased was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ovisions of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act relied upon by the ld. counsel for the Accountable Person are quite clear and there is no doubt that the deceased has responsibility regarding the marriage expenses of the daughters, The question then in whether he was free to dispose of the property and in this connection whether that responsibility would amount to a charge on the property which woul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
