1984 (6) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as made ex parte under s. 144 of the IT Act. The assessee had filed a petition under s. 146 of the Act on 8th March, 1982 which was within the prescribed time. Unfortunately, this petition was addressed by mistake to the ITO to District III(I) instead of the ITO District III(2), who was the correct officer assessing the assessee. Hence, the petition under s. 146 remained undisposed of. 3. The a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nder s. 146 within the prescribed time. Unfortunately, it was filed before the ITO, District III(I) instead of the ITO, District III (2), apparently due to inadvertence. When the mistake was pointed out, the assessee took prompt steps to rectify the same. The present position is that the petition filed by the assessee under s. 146 of the Act is still pending. The disposal of the appeal against the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X