CIT u/s 263 has simply directed the AO, without satisfying ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 26, 2016

CIT u/s 263 has simply directed the AO, without satisfying himself, to verify whether the bifurcation made by assessee was with a view to reduce tax or not. No infirmity for offering the tax on sale of brands as LTCG. There is no merit in CIT’s observation for treating the same as business income. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIT u/s 263 has simply directed the AO, without satisfying ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 26, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

Revision u/s 263 - Ld. Pr. CIT exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act, directed the AO to make fresh assessment on the issues which were not the subject...

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

Revision u/s 263 - the AO also mentioned in the order that “The Documents as submitted by the assessee were examined and placed on record”, however no remark on the...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

Quick Updates: