Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of unexplained sundry ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 1, 2016

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of unexplained sundry creditor - bogus purchases - the nonpayment of purchase consideration is a strong circumstance regarding non-genuineness of transactions and stands on its own de hors any other evidence. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of unexplained sundry ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 1, 2016

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Addition u/s 68 - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - concealment of particulars - unexplained cash credit / bogus purchases - At the time of assessment, the...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Validity of penalty orders u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has not filed the details in respect of interest payment, unexplained investment in jewellery, bogus sundry...

Addition u/s. 41(1) - bogus creditors - cessation of liability in case of outstanding of above sundry creditors - the given facts and circumstances suggests that the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

Quick Updates: