As per the provisions of section 271D and 271E, for any default ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 9, 2017

As per the provisions of section 271D and 271E, for any default u/s 269SS and 269T, penalty is leviable. However, such penalty is to be imposed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessment order in the present case was completed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and hence beyond his jurisdiction. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

As per the provisions of section 271D and 271E, for any default ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 9, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries -...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D & 271E - default u/s 269SS & 269T - CIT(A) deleted the penalty holding that general entries leading to assignment of debt does not attract...

Penalty u/s 271D and penalty u/s. 271E - Default u/s 269SS and u/s 269T - Loan/deposits taken/paid by the assessee in cash is more than Rs.20,000/- - after evaluating...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of Section 269T - repayment by journal entries - penalty imposed u/s 271E deserves to be deleted - HC

Penalty u/s. 271E - violation of the provisions of Section 269T - Repayment of monthly instalment in cash to Tata Finance Corporation - as the assessee had not only...

Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - loans in question were received by the assessee in cash from her daughter and son-in-law - no penalty leviable

Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - accepting deposits by way of journal entries - assessee had accepted/paid loans in contravention of provision of section 269SS/269T -...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

Penalty u/s. 271D and u/s. 271E - default u/s 269SS and 269T - acceptance and repayment of loans or deposits in cash - In case, if the veracity was doubted, then the...

Quick Updates: