Levy of penalty - It emerges that the entire exercise was a ...

Case Laws Customs

July 21, 2017

Levy of penalty - It emerges that the entire exercise was a meticulously planned one by the appellants who utilized loopholes in the system to obtain clearances of imported goods with their definite knowledge under confiscation. Their conduct cannot be but otherwise considered as one of deceit and contumacious.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - It emerges that the entire exercise was a ...

Case Laws Customs

July 21, 2017

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire facts were available on record and on this there is no dispute; nor is there any contrary finding by the adjudicating authority. The...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Entitlement of Appellant(s)/ Applicant to be given a copy of Resolution Plan or any part of the Resolution Plan in the Appeal - When the right to Appeal on the ground...

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants...

Non-compliance with submission of Performance Bank Guarantee by the Appellant as per the Request for Resolution Plan's clause obliging the Resolution Applicant to...

Levy of penalty equal to 200% - Detention of consignments - quantity of the boxes were lesser than the quantity shown in the document - levying penalty on the entire...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

The Supreme Court held that the Effective Date for implementing the Resolution Plan was achieved on 20.05.2022 as all Conditions Precedent were fulfilled. The...

Violation of principles of natural justice, wherein the appellant was not provided an opportunity for a hearing before terminating the insolvency resolution process of...

No doubt the discretion to levy the penalty or to drop the penalty proceedings is entirely the discretion of the appropriate authority who is authorized under the...

Validity of approved Resolution Plan - Order of liquidation issued - the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that if the Appellant is allowed to manage...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Delayed filings of return - Penalty u/s 76 - claim of relief for waiver of penalty u/s 80 - Since no acceptable cause or reason had been shown by the appellant for...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's claim for outstanding income tax demands against the corporate debtor could not be admitted...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Quick Updates: