Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchase found during search - as ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 18, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchase found during search - as per a specific provision of explanation 5A assessee has been found to be owner of undisclosed income by furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, based upon entry of bogus purchases in its books of account - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchase found during search - as ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 18, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) OR 271AAA - unexplained cash deposits - the rate of penalty @ 200% is contemplated only u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and not u/s.271AAA of the Act. It...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessment proceeding u/s 153A - Nothing on record which suggests that any document/ material/ information was found during the course of search...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO has levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) only invoking the Explanation 5A below section 271(1)(c) and not held the assessee liable for concealment of...

Quick Updates: