Refund of tax - the department cannot get itself unjust enriched ...

Case Laws Service Tax

April 2, 2019

Refund of tax - the department cannot get itself unjust enriched by relying on Section 11B of the Act. If the services are not coming within the ambit of taxable service as contemplated under the Act 1994, Section 11B of the Act is not applicable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of tax - the department cannot get itself unjust enriched ...

Case Laws Service Tax

April 2, 2019

You may also like:

Refund of amount deposited under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - refund sought on the premise that the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of CENVAT Credit - unjust enrichment - It is not understood when no duty was paid and only credits availed were refunded, how come a case of unjust enrichment...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Since Department itself having admitted the fact that the appellant is controlled, funded and monitored by the State, it...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

By not making refund within time limit prescribed by law i.e. within three months, the Refund Officer has violated law and, therefore, when the department itself made...

Refund of excess amount paid over and above 1% of CVD - unjust enrichment - The refund claims were sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority itself. Those were...

Refund claim - deduction of tax known as security transaction tax by BSE - the stand of the Income Tax Department and from the pleadings in the writ petition itself is...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Seeking reimbursement / refund of “Amount paid twice” - The State is not expected to get itself unduly enriched by erroneous or forced or inadvertent payments of money...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the denial of refund of excess tax paid by contractors under the Haryana Alternative Tax Compliance Scheme for Contractors,...

Quick Updates: