Oppression and Mismanagement - requisite shareholding to ...

Case Laws Companies Law

September 28, 2022

Oppression and Mismanagement - requisite shareholding to maintain the Petition, present or not - There is no gain saying of the pivotal fact that Law does not coerce / force any Litigant to pursue the Litigation. In fact, in a Civil Suit / Civil Proceeding, a Plaintiff/ Petitioner is a Dominus Litis. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and Mismanagement - requisite shareholding to ...

Case Laws Companies Law

September 28, 2022

You may also like:

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with...

Oppression and mismanagement - Theft of documents - use of (such) documents in judicial proceedings is to substantiate their case namely, “oppression and mismanagement”...

Oppression and mismanagement - illegal transfer of shares - this Tribunal is exercising its ample powers to waive the requisite shareholding percentage in order to...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 being a shareholder with 25% shareholding at the time of incorporation and also being one of the...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Violation of the Status quo order - This Tribunal comes to a resultant conclusion that while passing of status quo order it should be...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and Mismanagement - the impugned order is a nonspeaking order. The question of Oppression, and Mismanagement, Maintainability and Limitation in the present...

Quick Updates: