Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2023 Year 2023 This

Revision u/s 263 - once we have found that AO has discharged the ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

April 17, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - once we have found that AO has discharged the duty of investigator (on the issue of deduction claimed u/s 24(a) of the Act which included amenities charges), then before CIT(E) holds the view of AO as erroneous, it was imperative on the part of CIT(E) to have made necessary enquiries or verification and should have arrived at a conclusion that the view of AO was unsustainable in law. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

  3. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - wrong claim of deduction u/s. 80JJA - the AO has not brought out anything explicitly and not recorded any finding with regard to the deduction...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - STCG on alleged Penny Stock - sale and purchase of shares listed on the BSE through registered share broker at rates of stock exchange - AO had...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  8. Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer thereafter he is an adjudicator but here in this case, the AO remained silent, but, he ought to have...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - Assessee merely kept referring to the decision that an enquiry was made by the ld. AO and section 263 should not have been invoked. We, however, find...

  11. Revision u/s 263 - the issue was duly considered by Ld. AO after considering assessee’s detailed submissions. The view could not be said to be unsustainable view and it...

  12. Revision u/s 263 - eligibility of claim for deduction u/s 54F - If it born out from record that AO has not examined the claim of assessee for deduction and allowed the...

  13. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - The ITAT held that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries into the sales promotion expenses, as evidenced by the issuance of specific queries to the...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - once the AO cannot examine any other issue except the issue as selected for limited scrutiny assessment, the PCIT can examine the only issue which was...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates