Protective demand - Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 22, 2023

Protective demand - Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules - Any decision on the protective demand Show Cause Notice dated 06.11.2012 issued to the appellants can only be an outcome of the decision in the remission application, outcome of which under the present circumstances is yet pending decision. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Protective demand - Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 22, 2023

You may also like:

Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - In case of breakage/destruction of final product, remission can be claimed under Rule 21 of Central...

Remission of duty - finished goods destroyed in the fire accident - inputs contained in the semi-finished goods destroyed in the fire accident - principles of natural...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

100% EOU - Remission of duty - Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - remission is allowed on the goods which were cleared for export but could not be exported due to accident.

Excise duty remission granted for goods destroyed by unavoidable fire accident as per Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs used in...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Demand of central excise duty - non-submission of proof of export before the jurisdictional Central Excise Authorities - matter remanded back for fresh decision - AT

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Appellate Tribunal's decision in identical matter of assessee for earlier period relied upon to dismiss department's appeal challenging determination of assessable value...

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Quick Updates: