Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated ...


High Court quashes reassessment notice, cites lack of fresh material.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 23, 2024

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the revenue authorities were invalid as there was no new tangible material or information suggesting escapement of income. The reopening was based solely on the material already available on record, which amounts to a mere change of opinion, impermissible under law. The revenue authorities had already considered the allowability of deductions u/ss 54B and 54F during the original assessment proceedings. Reopening the assessment on the ground that the Assessing Officer did not properly inquire or adopted a casual approach is not a valid reason to believe. The issuance of a notice u/s 148 must have a direct nexus with new information or tangible material that came to the knowledge of the authorities, which was lacking in this case. The court decided in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged - capital gain on co-owned land sale - reassessment based on DVO report alleging suppression of lower valuation - reasons...

  2. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  3. The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

  4. Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

  5. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  6. Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

  7. Reassessment proceedings initiated solely based on an audit objection without fresh tangible material are impermissible. A mere change of opinion by the Assessing...

  8. Validity of SCN - If the contents of impugned show cause notice are lacking in material particulars or are vague in regard to any of the entries contained therein then...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

  10. The Delhi High Court examined the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 after a four-year lapse. The court emphasized the requirement of "reasons to believe" for...

  11. Initiating proceedings u/s 153C - The High court held that the power under Section 153C necessitates the presence of incriminating material directly pertinent to the AYs...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - unexplained cash payment - Two notices issued u/s 148 - it is a case where pending conclusion of the first reassessment proceedings,...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

  14. Reassessment notice u/s 148 - in pursuant to notice u/s 142(1), petitioner had furnished complete details with various documentary evidence and case was discussed by the...

  15. Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates