The High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to apply ...

Taxpayer can apply under despite appeal's merits if case pending before / on filing date.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to apply under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (VSV Act) as an appeal regarding disputed tax was pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on the date of filing the application. The eligibility to apply under the VSV Act is not contingent on the merits of the maintainability of the appeal. The mere pendency of an appeal concerning any disputed tax before the ITAT or the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is sufficient to file a declaration u/s 4(1) of the VSV Act. The impugned communication rejecting the petitioner's declaration was set aside, and the designated authority was directed to consider the petitioner's declaration and undertaking in accordance with the applicable law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to apply ...

Taxpayer can apply under despite appeal's merits if case pending before / on filing date.

December 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

SVLDRS - rejection on the ground that the demand was not finally quantified nor communicated to the party on or before 30.06.2019 - The Scheme covers not only cases...

Rejection of declaration u/s 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (‘VSV Scheme’) - Case was pending or not - there remains no shadow of doubt that appeal could...

The key points covered in the legal document are: 1. It introduces new forms (GST SPL-01 to GST SPL-08) for taxpayers to apply for waiver of interest and penalty u/s...

Providing various e-Filing facility to Taxpayers for smooth GST Compliance

Extension of last date for filing GST returns by taxpayers in Kerala, Mahe and Kodagu extended

The circular addresses the Reduction of Government Litigation by setting monetary limits for filing appeals before GSTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. It refers to...

Rejection of petitioner’s application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - the legislative intent to enact the SVLDR Scheme was to include...

Time Limitation - Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner - Physical copies being submitted on 24.04.2023, beyond the condonable period while electronic filing was...

Admissibility of application for Advance ruling u/s 245R - Pending case - The pendency has to be considered on the date of filing of the application and there was no...

Guidelines clarify recovery proceedings in cases where first appeal is disposed but taxpayer cannot file further appeal due to non-operation of Appellate Tribunal....

Cancellation of GST registration - Registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically. It can be cancelled only if the proper officer deems it fit...

Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed the returns for some period does not mean that the taxpayer’s registration is...

Cancellation of registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - The registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically. It can be...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

Quick Updates: