Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 1995 (8) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1995 (8) TMI 234 - SC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Conviction under section 630 of the Companies Act
2. Relationship between the appellant and the company
3. Findings of the civil court superseding those of the criminal court

Analysis:

Issue 1: Conviction under section 630 of the Companies Act
The appellant, who was a former employee of Rallis India Ltd., was convicted under section 630 of the Companies Act for continued occupation of a residential flat owned by the company. The Magistrate found the appellant guilty, and this decision was partly upheld by the Session Judge. However, the Supreme Court analyzed the evidence and found that the company failed to prove that they were the tenant of the premises or that the appellant was a licensee. The appellant successfully argued that the findings of the civil court, which dismissed the suit for eviction, contradicted the criminal court's decision. Citing previous judgments, the Supreme Court emphasized that the existence of an employer-employee relationship is crucial for invoking section 630, and in this case, the appellant's independent tenancy rights were established, leading to the appeal being allowed.

Issue 2: Relationship between the appellant and the company
The primary dispute revolved around the nature of the relationship between the appellant and the company regarding the occupation of the flat. While the company claimed tenancy rights and the appellant's obligation to deliver possession post-resignation, the appellant contended that he was a tenant under a different landlord and not in possession as an employee of the company. The civil court's findings favored the appellant's version, highlighting the lack of a jural relationship with the company and affirming his independent tenancy status.

Issue 3: Findings of the civil court superseding those of the criminal court
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the civil court's findings, which negated the company's claims and established the appellant's independent tenancy rights. The Court held that the civil court's decision superseded the criminal court's findings, especially in cases like section 630 offenses. The Court clarified that the mere pendency of an appeal does not suspend the operation of the civil court's decree, giving precedence to its findings over those of the criminal court. Consequently, the appellant's conviction and the order to deliver possession were deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal without costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates