Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2015 (2) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (2) TMI 1042 - SC - Indian Laws


Issues Involved:
1. Quashing of FIR based on a compromise between the parties.
2. The nature of the offense under Section 307 IPC and its implications for quashing proceedings.
3. The power of the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. The distinction between compounding of offenses under Section 320 of the Code and quashing of proceedings under Section 482 of the Code.
5. Guidelines for the High Court to exercise its power under Section 482 of the Code.

Detailed Analysis:

Quashing of FIR Based on a Compromise Between the Parties:
The petitioners sought to quash FIR No.121/14.7.2010, registered under Sections 307/324/323/34 IPC, based on a compromise dated 22.7.2013. The High Court refused to quash the FIR, citing the grievous nature of the injuries sustained by the complainant, particularly injury No.3, which was serious as per the medical report. The petitioners argued that the parties had settled their differences, and continuing the criminal proceedings would be futile and a waste of court resources.

The Nature of the Offense Under Section 307 IPC:
Section 307 IPC pertains to the attempt to commit murder, which is a serious and non-compoundable offense. The Court emphasized that such offenses are generally considered crimes against society rather than individual disputes. The jurisprudence of sentencing, including theories of deterrence and retribution, was discussed to highlight the gravity of such offenses. However, the Court also acknowledged that not every case under Section 307 IPC might warrant the same treatment, especially if the injuries and circumstances suggest otherwise.

The Power of the High Court Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure:
The Supreme Court recognized that the High Court has inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code to quash criminal proceedings even for non-compoundable offenses if it serves the ends of justice or prevents abuse of the process of the court. This power is distinct from the power to compound offenses under Section 320 of the Code, which is limited to specific offenses and requires court permission.

The Distinction Between Compounding of Offenses Under Section 320 of the Code and Quashing of Proceedings Under Section 482 of the Code:
The Court elaborated on the difference between compounding offenses under Section 320 and quashing proceedings under Section 482. Compounding is guided solely by the compromise between the parties and is permissible for minor or non-serious offenses. In contrast, quashing under Section 482 involves a broader consideration of whether continuing the proceedings would serve justice or constitute an abuse of the court's process.

Guidelines for the High Court to Exercise Its Power Under Section 482 of the Code:
The Court laid down specific guidelines for the High Court to follow when considering quashing proceedings based on a compromise:
1. The power under Section 482 should be exercised sparingly and with caution.
2. The guiding factors should be the ends of justice and preventing abuse of the court's process.
3. Serious offenses, especially those involving mental depravity or significant societal impact, should not be quashed merely based on a compromise.
4. Offenses with a predominantly civil character, such as those arising from commercial transactions or matrimonial disputes, may be quashed if the parties have resolved their differences.
5. The High Court should assess whether the possibility of conviction is remote and whether continuing the proceedings would cause undue oppression or injustice to the accused.
6. The nature and gravity of the offense under Section 307 IPC should be carefully evaluated, including the injuries sustained and the weapons used.
7. The timing of the settlement is crucial, with more leniency possible if the settlement occurs early in the proceedings.

Application to the Present Case:
In the present case, the FIR was registered under Sections 307/324/323/34 IPC, and the investigation was complete with charges framed. The parties reached a compromise after the charges were framed but before the evidence was recorded. The Court noted that the dispute appeared to be personal, and the chances of conviction were minimal due to the compromise. The Court decided to quash the proceedings, acknowledging the importance of the compromise in promoting harmony and peace between the parties.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No.121 dated 14.7.2010, acknowledging the compromise between the parties and the minimal chances of conviction. The judgment provides a comprehensive framework for the High Courts to exercise their powers under Section 482 of the Code, balancing the interests of justice and societal impact.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates