Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2016 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (7) TMI 1444 - HC - Money Laundering


Issues: Allegation of disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act, validity of investigation under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, violation of fundamental rights under Article 20(1) of the Constitution.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives, faced prosecution under Sections 7 and 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. Subsequently, a case was registered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) based on an Information Report (Ext.P2). The petitioner challenged the sustainability of the investigation under PMLA, citing non-existence of the Act during the alleged offences and violation of Article 20(1) of the Constitution.

2. The petitioner contended that the PMLA investigation stemmed from his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act for amassing wealth beyond known sources from 1997 to 2002, while the PMLA came into force in 2013. However, the court clarified that the PMLA focuses on money laundering, independent of the scheduled offences, dealing with proceeds of crime concealment, possession, acquisition, or use. The timing of scheduled offences is irrelevant for PMLA prosecution; what matters is the timing of money laundering acts, thus dismissing the Article 20(1) violation argument.

3. The court highlighted that the PMLA investigation was initiated based on suspicion of the petitioner's involvement in money laundering under Section 3 of the Act, with the investigation ongoing. The court emphasized that the absence of all Section 3 offence elements in the Information Report doesn't warrant interference with the investigation. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, deeming it meritless in challenging the PMLA investigation's validity under the circumstances.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates