Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 1974 (10) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1974 (10) TMI 110 - SC - Indian Laws

Issues involved: The jurisdiction of the High Court to quash a proceeding after rejecting a previous application for the same.

Summary:
1. The case involved a lorry accident resulting in the death of a girl. The owner, manager, and driver were prosecuted under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court initially rejected an application to quash the proceeding but later allowed a subsequent application and quashed the proceeding. The State contended that the High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the second application. The Supreme Court held that the High Court was justified in considering the subsequent application due to the lack of progress in the criminal case and the changed circumstances. The Order to quash the proceeding was deemed valid as no prima facie case was established against the accused.

2. The main question debated was the jurisdiction of the High Court to quash the proceeding after rejecting a previous application. The State argued that it amounted to a review of the earlier Order, which was beyond the High Court's jurisdiction. However, the Supreme Court disagreed, stating that the circumstances had changed, justifying the High Court's decision to entertain the subsequent application. The High Court's inherent power under Section 561A allowed it to prevent abuse of the process of the Court or secure the ends of justice based on the prevailing situation.

3. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the proceeding, as no prima facie case was found against the accused. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the High Court's Order in light of the circumstances and the lack of progress in the criminal case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates