Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2018 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (1) TMI 1587 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Default in loan payment by the Corporate Debtor
2. Validity of the application filed by the Financial Creditor
3. Authority of the Financial Creditor to initiate insolvency process
4. Allegations of suppression of material facts by the Corporate Debtor
5. Admissibility of the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Issue 1: Default in loan payment by the Corporate Debtor
The Financial Creditor filed C.P.(IB) No.695 of 2017 alleging that the Corporate Debtor defaulted on a loan of ?25,00,000. The loan agreement required payment of interest amounting to ?73,973, with supporting documents like postdated cheques and loan confirmation statements. The Corporate Debtor failed to repay the loan even after demand, leading to the cheque being dishonored due to insufficient funds.

Issue 2: Validity of the application filed by the Financial Creditor
The Financial Creditor presented all necessary documents to prove the loan default, including the loan agreement, bank statements, demand letters, and confirmation statements. The Corporate Debtor raised objections, claiming the application was premature and that there was no default. However, the Tribunal found the application complete and admissible under Section 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Issue 3: Authority of the Financial Creditor to initiate insolvency process
The Corporate Debtor contested the authority of the Financial Creditor to file the insolvency application, alleging suppression of material facts and lack of authorization. However, the Financial Creditor provided a board resolution authorizing the application, proving the authority to initiate the insolvency process.

Issue 4: Allegations of suppression of material facts by the Corporate Debtor
The Corporate Debtor argued that the loan period was extended based on mutual understanding until March 2018, and hence, there was no default. However, the Financial Creditor presented evidence contradicting this claim, including demand letters and confirmation statements, which the Tribunal found to be more credible.

Issue 5: Admissibility of the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Innoventive Industries Ltd v. ICICI Bank, emphasizing that once a default is established, the application must be admitted. The Tribunal found that all necessary criteria under Section 7(5)(a) were met, leading to the admission of the application and declaration of a moratorium on legal actions against the Corporate Debtor.

Overall, the Tribunal admitted the application, appointed an interim resolution professional, and declared a moratorium to facilitate the corporate insolvency resolution process. The order communicated directions to ensure the protection of assets and continuation of essential services during the moratorium period.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates