Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (1) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (1) TMI 1254 - Tri - Insolvency and BankruptcyMaintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - corporate debtor failed to make repayment of its debt - existence of debt and dispute or not - time limitation - HELD THAT - The learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the respondent company filed an additional affidavit admitting the total amount as claimed in the petition. That, the documents filed along with the application is sufficient to prove that there exists financial debt and the application is not barred by limitation. The Adjudicating Authority is of the considered view that there is debt due to financial creditors and there is default on the part of the corporate debtor - the application is complete in all respects and is to be admitted. Petition admitted - moratorium declared.
Issues:
- Application under section 7 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 seeking reliefs under section 7(5)(a) and section 13(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Code. - Existence of financial debt and default by the corporate debtor. - Completeness of the application and acknowledgment of debt by the respondent company. - Appointment of an interim resolution professional and declaration of moratorium. Analysis: The judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, involved an application under section 7 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking reliefs under specific sections of the Code. The financial creditors, comprising several private limited companies, extended financial assistance to the corporate debtor in the form of unsecured loans. The total debt granted and the amount claimed to be in default were detailed in the application, along with supporting documents such as promissory notes and communication records. The respondent corporate debtor raised issues regarding the maintainability of the petition in their affidavit in reply. Upon examining the documents and submissions from both parties, the Tribunal found that the respondent company admitted the total amount claimed in the petition. It was established that there existed financial debt and that the application was not barred by limitation. The Tribunal referenced judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court to support its findings, emphasizing the definition of debt, default, and the process for a financial creditor to trigger insolvency proceedings under section 7 of the Code. The Tribunal concluded that the application was complete and warranted no rejection or dismissal. It was satisfied that the corporate debtor had defaulted in paying the financial debt to the applicants, and the debt acknowledgment further supported this finding. The Tribunal appointed an interim resolution professional and declared a moratorium, prohibiting certain actions against the corporate debtor. The order of moratorium was to remain in effect until the completion of the insolvency resolution process or other specified events. The Tribunal disposed of the petition, with no order as to costs, and directed communication of the order to all relevant parties involved. In summary, the judgment addressed the issues of debt existence, default by the corporate debtor, completeness of the application, appointment of an interim resolution professional, and declaration of a moratorium, following a thorough analysis of the submissions and supporting legal framework under The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
|