Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 1959 (12) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1959 (12) TMI 66 - SC - Indian Laws

Issues:
Appeal against acquittal under Section 5 of the Indian Official Secrets Act - Corroboration of evidence of accomplice witness - Reliability of witness Aggarwal's testimony - Interpretation of Section 5(2) of the Act.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Delhi against the Punjab High Court's judgment acquitting the respondent of an offence under Section 5 of the Indian Official Secrets Act. The High Court set aside the conviction based on the lack of corroboration of the evidence of witness Aggarwal, who was considered an accomplice. The prosecution's case involved the respondent obtaining a secret file containing government office notings related to illegal imports, with Aggarwal typing copies of the file. The crucial issue revolved around the reliability of Aggarwal's testimony, as his cross-examination revealed inconsistencies and unreliability, casting doubt on his credibility as a witness. The Additional Sessions Judge believed Aggarwal's examination-in-chief but noted inconsistencies in his subsequent statements, suggesting he had been influenced by the respondent. The Judge's reliance on Aggarwal's statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code was deemed erroneous by the Supreme Court, as such statements are not substantive evidence. The Court concluded that Aggarwal's varying statements in cross-examination before and after the charge framing rendered him an untrustworthy witness, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

The Court declined to interpret Section 5(2) of the Act, focusing instead on the issue of witness credibility. Despite the prosecution's reliance on Aggarwal's testimony to establish the respondent's guilt, the Court found Aggarwal's inconsistent statements and unreliability undermined the case against the respondent. The Court highlighted the dangers of relying on unreliable witness testimony, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence to support the charges. The judgment underscored the fundamental principle that conviction must rest on credible and consistent evidence, which was lacking in this case due to Aggarwal's unreliable testimony. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Punjab High Court's acquittal of the respondent based on the insufficiency of evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates