Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2021 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (9) TMI 1372 - ITAT DELHIPE in India - attribution of profits - existence of a subsidiary in India which is carrying on its own business as commission agent of the appellant - Scope of India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement - HELD THAT:- As relying on assessee's own case [2017 (7) TMI 420 - ITAT DELHI] substantiate the allegation of deputation of any employees for rendering Technical support services, in view of this we do not agree with the revenue that services are rendered in India by deputation of employees in India by the appellant. With respect to the payment of royalty, It was submitted that Indian entity from time to time participates in various trade fairs and disseminate information about the products and engaged in promotional activity and for this purpose, it has right to use the trademark which is not held by the appellant but different entity. As this transaction is not between the appellant and the Indian entity where it is undisputed that the trademarks are not owned by the appellant but by different entity, these facts does not lead to creation of a permanent establishment in India of appellant Thus we hold that the assessee company does not have any Permanent Establishment in India. Since, the question regarding Permanent Establishment is being answered in favour of the assessee, the issue of attribution of income in the hands of such Permanent Establishment becomes infrutuous. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. Treatment of software and sale of subscription receipts as the royalty income under Article 12(3) of the India-Netherlands DTAA - HELD THAT:- The issue of software royalty was recently adjudicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. [2021 (3) TMI 138 - SUPREME COURT] has analyzed various aspects of the issue taking into consideration end user license, Copy Right Act, and provisions contained in DTAA and the Income Tax Act and has laid down the parameters to test whether the receipt from sale of software would tantamount to royalty or not. Therefore, in view of the above, the Assessing Officer is directed to carry out the necessary exercise in accordance with the directions issued by the Co-ordinate Bench in Assessment Year 2008-09 [2017 (7) TMI 420 - ITAT DELHI] duly keeping in mind the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (supra) and adjudicate the issue accordingly after giving due and proper opportunity to the assessee to present its case. Thus, ground Nos. 3 & 4 are allowed for statistical purposes. Taxing of income from provisions of service by treating the same as Fee for Technical Services - assessee has received payment to the extent in lieu of services rendered to Indian customers. The services so provided are in the nature of installation services, warranty services, or professional services such as data migration, disaster management etc. - HELD THAT:- It is undisputed that the impugned addition in the year under consideration is solely based on the reasoning recorded in assessment orders for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2010-11. Since, the findings of the Assessing Officer with regard to this issue in 2008-09 & 2010-11 are no longer valid as having been disproved by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal, we find no reason to uphold the action of the Assessing Officer in taxing the impugned receipts in India. Thus, the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal has specifically held that services performed by the assessee company cannot be taxed in India in absence of satisfaction of make available clause. In absence of change in facts and keeping in view the uniformity in the nature of services, we find no justification in the action of the Assessing Officer in bringing to tax service receipts as FTS and the addition so made is directed to be deleted. Accordingly, Ground No.5 stands allowed. Addition on account of sale of products by the assessee company to M/s NetApp India - AO as observed that the assessee failed to explain why the amount so received is not taxable in India and that no agreement, evidence or documents were produced before him to demonstrate the nature of transactions and goods sold - HELD THAT: - Assessing Officer has considered the income from the sale of equipment as business income taxable in India. However, it is worthwhile to know that as per Article 7 of the India-Netherland DTAA, the business income earned by a resident of a state from business carried in another State is taxable only in the resident state unless such business is carried in other State through PE. In the present case, we have already held that the assessee company does not have a Permanent Establishment in India and as such the business income so arising on sale of equipment cannot be taxed in India as per the express provision of Article 7 of DTAA. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer is directed to delete the addition made on account of business income. This ground is accordingly allowed. Charging to interest u/s 234B - HELD THAT:- This issue of chargeability of interest is set aside to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction that in case the assessee has any income chargeable to tax in India and if the same is subject to withholding to tax, no interest u/s 234B should be charged. Ground No.10 accordingly is allowed.
|