Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2021 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (9) TMI 1385 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues Involved:
1. Challenge to the communication from the Regional Passport Officer regarding shortcomings in the passport application.
2. Issuance of a fresh passport in accordance with Government of India circulars.
3. Impact of pending criminal proceedings on passport issuance.
4. Legal provisions under the Passports Act, 1967.
5. Court's parameters for granting permission for passport issuance in cases with pending criminal proceedings.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Challenge to the Communication from the Regional Passport Officer:
The petitioner challenged the communication issued by the Regional Passport Officer, which informed him of the shortcomings in his passport application. The petitioner contended that despite having proper police clearance and the closure of the crime registered against him, the passport authorities were harassing him by referring to those false crimes.

2. Issuance of a Fresh Passport:
The petitioner sought relief for the issuance of a fresh passport in accordance with the circulars issued by the Government of India. He argued that he had applied for a fresh passport on 26.11.2012, but due to the registration of a crime, his application was adversely affected, and the file was closed. Despite reapplying after five years and obtaining a police clearance, the passport authorities cited shortcomings in his application.

3. Impact of Pending Criminal Proceedings on Passport Issuance:
The court acknowledged that the petitioner admitted a crime was still pending against him but at the investigation stage. The court considered the circumstances under which a passport could be denied to a citizen of India, particularly under section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, which mandates refusal of a passport if "criminal proceedings are pending" before a criminal court in India.

4. Legal Provisions under the Passports Act, 1967:
The court discussed the relevant provisions of the Passports Act, 1967, particularly sections 5 and 6, which deal with the application and refusal of passports. Section 6(2)(f) specifically addresses the refusal of passports to applicants with pending criminal proceedings. The court also referred to the Government of India's notification GSR 570(E) dated 25.8.1993, which exempts citizens with pending criminal proceedings from the operation of section 6(2)(f) if they produce court orders permitting them to depart from India.

5. Court's Parameters for Granting Permission for Passport Issuance:
The court laid down parameters for criminal courts to consider while granting permission for passport issuance to individuals with pending criminal proceedings. These parameters include:
- The stage of the criminal proceeding and the expected duration of the trial.
- The criminal antecedents and past conduct of the accused.
- The nature and gravity of the crime, with special consideration for terrorism and smuggling.
- Limiting the permission period in heinous crimes.
- Assessing the chances of the accused fleeing or evading trial.
- Ensuring the presence of the accused during trial through conditions like providing the address abroad.
- Fixing the period for which the accused can travel abroad if not specified by the Magistrate.

The court emphasized that these parameters aim to balance the fundamental right to travel abroad with the need to ensure the accused's presence during trial.

Conclusion:
The writ petition was disposed of with the observation that the petitioner should approach the jurisdictional Magistrate to obtain appropriate orders if the final report had been filed and cognizance taken. If the final report had not been filed, the Passport Authority could decide on the passport issuance without needing permission from the Magistrate. The petitioner was given the liberty to file an explanation to the communication within ten days, and the second respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates