Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (7) TMI 665 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Improper service of notice under section 148.
2. Assumption of jurisdiction for re-assessment based on presumption/suspicion.
3. Non-allowance of benefits for amounts received from family members and cash in hand.
4. Enhancement of income without show cause notice.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Improper Service of Notice under Section 148:
The appellant did not press this ground of appeal. Consequently, it was rejected as not pressed.

2. Assumption of Jurisdiction for Re-assessment Based on Presumption/Suspicion:
The appellant contended that the re-assessment proceedings were initiated on mere presumption and suspicion, which is not valid. The appellant relied on the case of 'Bir Bahadur Singh Sijwali vs. I.T.O.' to argue that the assumption that bank deposits constitute undisclosed income without verifying the source is fallacious. The Department argued that the issuance of an enquiry letter dated 13.03.2008 by the Assessing Officer (AO) to verify the source of cash deposits provided a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal found that the enquiry letter did not mention the provision under which it was issued and lacked prior approval from the competent authority, making it invalid. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's belief of income escapement based solely on the information of cash deposits and the non-response to the invalid enquiry letter was not justified. Consequently, the reasons recorded for initiating the assessment proceedings under section 147 were deemed insufficient, and the proceedings were cancelled.

3. Non-allowance of Benefits for Amounts Received from Family Members and Cash in Hand:
The appellant argued that the CIT(A) erred in not allowing the benefit of amounts received from the mother and father, and cash in hand for making bank deposits. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue due to the cancellation of the re-assessment proceedings under section 147, rendering this ground non-surviving for adjudication.

4. Enhancement of Income Without Show Cause Notice:
The appellant contended that the CIT(A) enhanced the income by ?60,000 as estimated income from taxi driving without issuing a show cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. Since the re-assessment proceedings were cancelled, the Tribunal did not need to adjudicate this ground.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found that the re-assessment proceedings were initiated based on an invalid enquiry letter and mere suspicion, which is not sustainable in law. The reasons for initiating the assessment proceedings under section 147 and all subsequent proceedings were cancelled. As a result, the appeal was partly allowed, and the remaining grounds did not survive for adjudication.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates