Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (3) TMI 417 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Deletion of addition on account of interest payment to bogus loan creditors.
3. Deletion of addition due to non-deposit of employees' contribution to PF and ESI within the due date.
4. Allowance of interest on late payment of TDS.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The main grievance of the revenue was that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of ?2,60,67,315/- under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, without calling for a remand report when twelve companies that provided loans to the assessee could not be located at the given addresses. The AO had added the amount as unexplained cash credit, suspecting the companies to be paper entities. However, the CIT(A) deleted the addition based on the documentation provided by the assessee, which included balance sheets, bank statements, and ITRs of the loan creditors.

The Tribunal noted that the AO had not provided any substantial evidence to disprove the documents submitted by the assessee. The AO's assertion that the loan creditors could not be located was not supported by any physical verification or inspector's report. The Tribunal found that nine out of the twelve loan creditors had responded to the AO's notices under Section 133(6), and the assessee had provided sufficient documentation to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the loan transactions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the onus had shifted to the AO to disprove the materials placed before him, which he failed to do.

2. Deletion of Addition on Account of Interest Payment to Bogus Loan Creditors:
The AO had disallowed interest expenditure of ?12,75,987/- paid to the twelve loan creditors, considering them bogus entities. However, the Tribunal, while adjudicating the first issue, found that the loan creditors were not bogus and that the interest was paid through banking channels with TDS duly deducted. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition.

3. Deletion of Addition Due to Non-Deposit of Employees' Contribution to PF and ESI within the Due Date:
The AO had added ?8,46,634/- to the assessee's income for non-deposit of employees' contribution to PF and ESI within the due date prescribed under the respective Acts. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had deposited the amount before the due date for filing the return of income. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Vijay Shree Ltd.

4. Allowance of Interest on Late Payment of TDS:
The AO had disallowed ?3,15,107/- being the interest on late payment of TDS. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction, taking note of the Tribunal's decision in the case of M/s. Narayani Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court's decision in Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the interest on delayed payment of TDS is an allowable expense under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, confirming the CIT(A)'s order on all grounds. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and proper verification by the AO before making additions under Section 68 and disallowing expenses.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates