Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (7) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 515 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Verification of debt and default.
3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
4. Declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
5. Compliance with procedural requirements and legal obligations.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The Union Bank of India, as the petitioner, filed the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, for initiating the CIRP against M/s. Greendiamz Biotech Ltd., the corporate debtor. The petition outlined the financial debt and the default by the corporate debtor.

2. Verification of Debt and Default:
The petitioner provided detailed particulars of the financial debt, including various loan facilities granted to the corporate debtor, totaling ?48,46,00,000, and the outstanding amount claimed to be in default as ?85,71,54,265.28 as of September 30, 2018. The corporate debtor did not categorically deny its debt liability but sought time for a one-time settlement proposal. The Tribunal examined the merits and found the debt and default to be well-established, satisfying the requirements under Section 3(11) and (12) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):
The petitioner proposed Mr. Chandra Prakash Jain as the IRP, and his consent was annexed in the prescribed format. The Tribunal appointed Mr. Chandra Prakash Jain as the IRP, confirming that no disciplinary proceedings were pending against him.

4. Declaration of Moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The Tribunal declared a moratorium effective from May 27, 2020, which includes:
- Prohibiting the institution or continuation of suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor.
- Prohibiting the transfer, encumbrance, alienation, or disposal of any assets of the corporate debtor.
- Prohibiting any action to foreclose, recover, or enforce any security interest.
- Ensuring the supply of essential goods or services to the corporate debtor is not terminated or suspended.

5. Compliance with Procedural Requirements and Legal Obligations:
The Tribunal directed the IRP to make a public announcement of the CIRP and call for submissions of claims. The IRP is required to perform functions as per Sections 17, 18, 20, and 21 of the Code, and all personnel associated with the corporate debtor are legally obligated to assist the IRP. The Tribunal emphasized the IRP's duty to protect and preserve the value of the corporate debtor's property and manage its operations as a going concern.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the CIRP against M/s. Greendiamz Biotech Ltd., appointed Mr. Chandra Prakash Jain as the IRP, and declared a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The commencement of the CIRP was effective from the date of the order.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates