Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (12) TMI 1146 - AT - Income TaxLong term capital gain arising on the sale of land u/s. 50C - CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee stating that there was no categorical request made by the assessee before the Assessing Officer that the valuation may be referred to the departmental valuation officer - HELD THAT - We consider that the assessee has categorically brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer that the value adopted by the stamp valuation authority in his case exceed the fair market value of the property as on the date of transfer because the circumstances cited as supra in this order. Therefore, we consider that to verify the facts reported by the assessee, the Assessing Officer could have referred the issue for valuation of the sold capital asset to a Departmental Valuation Officer under the provision of section 50C(2) We restore this case to the file of the Assessing Officer for deciding the issue of long term capital gain earned on sale of the impugned land afresh after referring the matter to the departmental valuation officer. Therefore, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Issues:
- Addition of long term capital gain on the sale of land under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - Dismissal of appeal by the CIT(A) regarding the above addition. Analysis: 1. The primary issue in this case revolves around the addition of long term capital gain on the sale of land under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer valued the deemed sale consideration at a higher amount than what the assessee had shown, leading to a substantial difference in the calculated long term capital gain. The assessee explained the reasons behind selling the land at a lower price due to various legal issues and litigations, which the Assessing Officer did not fully accept. The CIT(A) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer, resulting in the aggrieved assessee filing an appeal. 2. Upon hearing both sides and perusing the material on record, it was observed that the Assessing Officer had not adequately addressed the legal issues raised by the assessee regarding the sale of the land. The assessee had detailed the circumstances that led to selling the land at a lower price, including ongoing disputes and difficulties in obtaining possession. The Assessing Officer did not dispute these legal issues in his findings. The CIT(A) based the dismissal of the appeal on the lack of a specific request by the assessee to refer the valuation to the departmental valuation officer. However, the submission made by the assessee during assessment clearly highlighted the circumstances surrounding the sale price, warranting further investigation. 3. In light of the above facts and circumstances, the Tribunal decided to restore the case to the file of the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the issue of long term capital gain earned from the sale of the land. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to refer the matter to the departmental valuation officer for verification, as per the provisions of section 50C(2) of the Act. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, providing an opportunity for a more thorough examination of the valuation and legal issues involved in the sale transaction. 4. Ultimately, the Tribunal's decision to remand the case back to the Assessing Officer for a reevaluation of the long term capital gain on the sale of the land underscores the importance of considering all relevant factors, including legal complexities and valuation discrepancies, in determining the tax implications of such transactions. The restoration of the case for further assessment ensures a fair and comprehensive review of the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
|