Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Benami Property Benami Property + HC Benami Property - 2022 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 19 - HC - Benami Property


Issues:
1. Quashing of order under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
2. Retroactive or prospective effect of the Benami Property Act as amended by the Amendment Act of 2016.

Analysis:
Issue 1: The petitioner sought the quashing of an order dated 27.04.2022 passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 26(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The alleged benami property transaction occurred before the 2016 amendment came into force. The High Court referred to a recent decision in a similar matter where it was held that the provisions of the Benami Property Act were unconstitutional from their inception due to being overly broad and lacking adequate safeguards. Consequently, the High Court set aside the impugned order dated 27.04.2022.

Issue 2: The High Court discussed the retroactive or prospective effect of the Benami Property Act as amended by the Amendment Act of 2016. The Supreme Court's decision clarified that the Amendment Act of 2016 was not merely procedural but contained substantive provisions. It was held that concerned authorities cannot initiate or continue criminal prosecution or confiscation proceedings for transactions entered into before the 2016 Amendment Act came into force. The in rem forfeiture provision under Section 5 of the Amendment Act of 2016, being punitive in nature, can only be applied prospectively and not retroactively. As a result, all such prosecutions or confiscation proceedings for transactions entered into before 25.10.2016 were to be quashed. The High Court, in line with the Supreme Court's ruling, allowed the writ petition to the extent of setting aside the impugned order and closed any pending miscellaneous petitions.

In summary, the High Court's judgment addressed the quashing of the order under the Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, and the application of the Amendment Act of 2016, following the Supreme Court's decision on the retroactive or prospective effect of the amended provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates