Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2016 Year 2016 This

Validity of assessment order - whether the AO can make additions ...

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax

December 19, 2016

Validity of assessment order - whether the AO can make additions solely relying upon the third party statement and without any further corroborative evidence - Held No - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - receipt of share application money - reliance on statement of third parties - The statements of third parties i.e. two angadias relied upon by the ld....

  2. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  3. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  4. Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third party evidences reliable or not - It is settled that statements of dealers and transporters and the...

  5. CENVAT Credit - Bogus firms - fraudulent Cenvat Credit passing chain to facilitate availment of Cenvat Credit without actual manufacture and supply of duty paid goods -...

  6. Addition solely on the basis of Departmental valuation report – addition cannot be justified solely relying upon the valuation report - HC

  7. Clandestine removal of goods - Recovery of incriminating documents - The uncorroborated statements of third party cannot be adopted as an evidence, without corroboration...

  8. The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

  9. The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  11. Clandestine removal - cross-examination of persons whose statements were relied upon - As per Section 9D, the provisions are clear that, before relying on the statement...

  12. Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

  13. Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

  14. Assessment u/s 153A - admission made u/s 132(4) - The fundamental difference between evidentiary value of statement under S. 132(4) against the maker of statement...

  15. Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates